Cohere: Towards Web 2.0 Argumentation
نویسنده
چکیده
Students, researchers and professional analysts lack effective tools to make personal and collective sense of problems while working in distributed teams. Central to this work is the process of sharing—and contesting—interpretations via different forms of argument. How does the “Web 2.0” paradigm challenge us to deliver useful, usable tools for online argumentation? This paper reviews the current state of the art in Web Argumentation, describes key features of the Web 2.0 orientation, and identifies some of the tensions that must be negotiated in bringing these worlds together. It then describes how these design principles are interpreted in Cohere, a web tool for social bookmarking, idea-linking, and argument visualization.
منابع مشابه
Cohere: Towards Web 2.0 Argumentation
Students, researchers and professional analysts lack effective tools to make personal and collective sense of problems while working in distributed teams. Central to this work is the process of sharing—and contesting—interpretations via different forms of argument. How does the “Web 2.0” paradigm challenge us to deliver useful, usable tools for online argumentation? This paper reviews the curre...
متن کاملA review of argumentation for the Social Semantic Web
Argumentation represents the study of views and opinions that humans express with the goal of reaching a conclusion through logical reasoning. Since the 1950’s, several models have been proposed to capture the essence of informal argumentation in different settings. With the emergence of the Web, and then the Semantic Web, this modeling shifted towards ontologies, while from the development per...
متن کاملKnowledge Federation as Hypermedia Discourse
The motivation behind the concept of Knowledge Federation resonates closely with the orientation of the Hypermedia Discourse project and the Knowledge Cartography focus of a forthcoming book. We are concerned with the co-evolution of new tools and practices for “bringing together” ideas, sharing the KF orientation that meaning is always contextualised, that truth is often contested, and that so...
متن کاملArgumentation 3.0: how Semantic Web technologies can improve argumentation modeling in Web 2.0 environments
Argumentative discussions are common in Web 2.0 applications, but the social Web still offers limited or no explicit support for argumentation. As Web 2.0 applications become more popular, modeling argumentation happening in these systems becomes important, to enable reuse and further understanding of online discussions. After reviewing four genres of online conversations–Web bulletin boards, W...
متن کاملMass argumentation and the semantic web
The World Wide Web (WWW) can be seen as an ideal platform for enhancing argumentative expression and communication, due to its ubiquity nd openness. Much argumentation takes place on personal blogs and on unstructured or semi-structured discussion forums. Recently, an increasing umber of Web 2.0 applications provide specific support for large-scale socially-contributed argumentative content. Wh...
متن کامل